Dear trainees,
In relation to portfolio assessment, I propose as an option (not required), the day of submission of the midterm portfolio deliver all the planned activities (seven total). The evaluation of the portfolio will be two (2) extra points on the exam.
I remember which are the activities for the portfolio Second Part:
No. 1. Analysis of a ruling on enforceability of the Civil Chamber of the TSJ (late 2010 or first quarter 2011).
No. 2. FORM GIVEN IN CLASS. Identify the substantive rules of law rules, and in this case to analyze the three elements, the connecting factor and doctrinal characteristics.
No. 3. Exercise plurality of methods (https: / / sites.google.com / site / catedradipucv /)
No. 4. Exercise Standards item 10 (https: / / sites.google.com / site / catedradipucv /)
No. 5. Application and procedural treatment of foreign law. Exercise which requires students to the assumption in IDENTIFY EACH OF THE DECISIONS THAT JUDIALES is reproduced below (Thesis factual or legal argument.)
No. 6. ratings. Responding to questions raised around the decision of the Court of Appeal of Algeria (French Protectorate) on December 24, 1889 (Anton v. Rosa Bartholo).
No. 7. forwarding, simple choice exercises
PD does not mean that just because the portfolio will deliver the two points, it will be reviewed and evaluated according to their content and presentation.
Greetings,
YARITZA PÉREZ
0 comments:
Post a Comment